Tampa’s Climate Action and Equity Plan

For those of you in Tampa, you might not be aware our city has a Climate Action and Equity Plan. There are numerous city projects that have not received adequate public input, especially regarding our roads and land use.

For example, driving lanes are being removed on historic El Prado Boulevard and the community is upset. The city agreed to hold a public meeting but I was told by a city councilman “The city staff are now about to start the construction stage” and “they tell me the purpose would be to inform the public.” (i.e. not make any changes)

In Tampa’s Vision Zero Action Plan, they highlight a “data-driven and collaborative approach”. As I explain in my petition, the latest Vision Zero project has hardly been data-driven, their study is a decade old, and didn’t project future volumes or consider the dangerous impact of spillover (from congestion) into our residential streets—not designed for through traffic. Their “study” skipped an entire segment of the Boulevard. In 2022, my questions addressed to the city were not answered. No signs have ever been posted on El Prado for public meetings, not then, not now.

Vision Zero is not about saving lives, it is about reducing carbon or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Removing driving lanes for bikes is not their only plan for reducing carbon emissions. Their plans call to densify Land Use “TO INDUCE ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY CHOICES.” Ultimately this is all to “help the City to decrease its GHG emissions.”

In other words, they don’t want you driving in cars. This is made quite clear in their Climate Action and Equity Plan, which describes increasing population density to eliminate the need to drive:


Planning for our Vision Zero congestion nightmare pays well, up to $115,876/year.

The city introduces this “new” job listing as: “This is professional work in urban planning in pursuit of Tampa’s Vision Zero initiative.”

Tampa’s Climate Action and Equity Plan suggests establishing policies such as “Re-evaluate, decrease and, where appropriate, eliminate off-street parking requirements.” They want to decrease and eliminate parking.


I thought the concern was 15-minute city prisons? They are aiming for 10 minute neighborhoods.


They want to collect data about vehicles on the road and archive it, so they can track and monitor progress of reducing vehicular use. Keep in mind some of that data might be about your movements and is collected by companies such as Flock:

The City of Tampa links to the Vision Zero Network, explaining it “was created to build momentum and advance Vision Zero in communities across the U.S.”

Vision Zero Network makes it clear they are using a “carrot and stick approach” and tells us they encourage “disincentivizing single-occupancy driving” with congestion pricing:

Remember the real goals here and how NYC eventually implemented congestion pricing. The pricing is not a flat fee. It sounds like a hidden algorithm. According to the Metropolitan Transit Authority “The toll amount depends on the type of vehicle, time of day, whether any crossing credits apply, and the method of payment. There are also discounts and exemptions that apply to certain drivers or vehicles entering the Congestion Relief Zone.”

Let’s not forget how intimately Vision Zero is tied to the United Nations, afterall Sustainable Development Goal #11 says “Bike, Walk or use Public Transportation.”

The UN and actions of WHA, UNRSC, WHO, and UNGA “led to Vision Zero…as a viable road safety strategy” and they promote Vision Zero as a model for countries and citizens in road safety programs.

We are a sovereign nation, we do not answer to the UN or globalists.

Governor DeSantis just signed HB1217, an anti-Net Zero law. The legislation states:

“Net zero policy” means any policy, program, or initiative designed to achieve a balance between total amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere with an equal amount removed from the atmosphere.”

It also states:

Will this law help us stop the whacky transformation of our transportation infrastructure to achieve net-zero? Will it stop the densification of our communitites to achieve net-zero? I hope so. In the meantime…

This is our community—not a globalist playground. We are Floridians, American citizens, not global citizens. Efforts to remove driving lanes could result in increased congestion, ugly barriers in the road, increased deaths and accidents, as well as a future where residents are encouraged to use public transit through negative motivations such as congestion pricing or smart parking pricing. It is time to stop Vision Zero and Tampa’s plans to densify our communities. Speak up and tell your city council and Mayor what you think about these plans.

This article was originally published on X.

Posted in Tampa News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Parents: Don’t Let Your Kids Carry Chips into Pinellas Schools!

Pinellas County Schools, Florida, just announced a pilot for two AI “weapons detection systems” starting in Spring 2026. This means students are going to be surveilled by an AI machine for weapons, and mathematical formulas could trigger on non-existent weapons—kids could be reported to authorities and police.

This is technofascism at its finest. Welcome to the new Public School of Dystopia, a world where students must live under constant physical and digital surveillance. They’ve turned public schools into a prison panopticon. The people in charge are not thinking about your child’s freedom, privacy, or how it will impact their behavior in little ways that eventually result in self-policed speech, and ultimately control of the public.

Let’s take a look at how one AI weapons detection system, Omnilert, just impacted a student in Baltimore County, Maryland. According to CNN’s interview with the student, he had a gun pointed at him, was forced to his knees, had his arms put behind his back, and was handcuffed because AI thought his bag of Doritos was a gun. No child should have to experience this for eating Doritos. Great work done by the Public School of Dystopia.

This kind of surveillance is alive and well in Florida, and has been, especially since the School “Safety” law was passed. Unfortunately this law resulted in a litany of weird and creepy digital programs and policies installed by the state of Florida. Such as monitoring social media, tracking with AI what students type into the apps they have to use for school, and so on. The law also created a report on students app that was promoted by former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who insisted during an October 2018 press conference that all students should use the app, FortifyFL. The problem with that was the app did not appear to be COPPA compliant, which I pointed out immediately on X, at the time, Twitter. COPPA is a federal law protecting the privacy of children under 13 from having their data collected by operators of websites or online services. Even worse, the app was reportedly not initially anonymous as marketed, though that was supposedly fixed by changing the default for location services to off during installation, I still had my doubts about its anonymity regardless of their “fix”.

As the world keeps moving at a breakneck pace building out our digital prison, let’s hope and pray that we resist Digital ID because AI false alarm events such as the “Doritos-gun” alert could automatedly and immediately be put on a permanent immutable blockchain record and might result in some negative outcomes, such as losing access to public transportation or your bank.

Pinellas schools says their pilot AI weapons detection system is “Enhancing Physical Safety.” It seems fully within the realm of possibility that such an AI system could hallucinate on a Doritos bag and cause a child to be faced with a crowd of cops and a gun pointed at him—I do not think this is “enhanced safety.”

Pinellas County Schools workshop, October 21, 2025

A child living in fear over what might alert the system in school is not a peaceful way to live. We the People have an inalienable right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; being surveilled by an AI that might result in facing a team of armed cops for eating Doritos is not compatible with any of these inalienable rights.

There is a real cultural impact of putting people under constant surveillance. It is dystopian, it is wrong; it will stifle free speech which is essential to our liberty, and it might even change how we act and what we eat! No more Doritos in school—though not a bad idea for public health it IS apparently a bad idea for AI weapons detection systems.

Posted in Data Privacy, EdTech Tyranny, PII, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Parents: Don’t Let Your Kids Carry Chips into Pinellas Schools!

Florida’s Public Schools: Your Local Psychometric Research Facility

Posted in Data Privacy, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Florida’s Public Schools: Your Local Psychometric Research Facility

You Asked Kids WHAT?!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on You Asked Kids WHAT?!

Florida’s Inappropriate School Surveys: Wait, How Many Surveys?

Posted in Data Privacy, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Florida’s Inappropriate School Surveys: Wait, How Many Surveys?

Florida Education Rebranded Mental Health and Social Emotional Learning as “Resiliency”: Leading the Way with a Globalist Agenda



https://citizenslighthouse.substack.com/p/florida-education-rebranded-mental

Posted in Data Privacy, Hillsborough Schools, PII, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Florida Education Rebranded Mental Health and Social Emotional Learning as “Resiliency”: Leading the Way with a Globalist Agenda

Public Schools: A Massive For-Profit Surveillance Operation

Schools surveil and collect data on children without your informed consent. School districts vary with respect to their Education Technology (EdTech) heavy handedness; but in my opinion one EdTech application is too many—it is data collection at risk of breach.

Our country is based on consent of the governed. Consent. Our founders fought for our liberty from British soldiers being stationed in our homes. Our thoughts, ideas, skills, and creations are our personal property.

Children are told they must use software in school, load apps on their personal phones, and/or operate web applications while on their home (owned) networks. When data is collected without consent, my definition of that is: spyware—especially when you ask to see what has been collected, who gets access, and they will NOT tell you. If you think laws are protecting you, think again; laws have loopholes.

Many school districts effectively mandate use of software that stations itself INSIDE our homes and personal property. Even worse, some of the software will report on your child if the AI is triggered! Don’t trigger the AI, the math might find your child dangerous, even when they are not in school.

We are not told:

  • What data is collected,
  • Every entity data is shared with,
  • How long specific data will be kept,
  • What is monitored on our home networks or cell phones,
  • If it is collecting keystroke patterns (biometrics), or
  • If data is used or shared to develop new educational products. (without compensation or consent as allowed under Florida’s SOPIPA law)

I could go on and on about what they don’t tell us. You get the idea.

As a parent, you are unlikely to receive the complete data held in association with your child’s identity by a third party—a third party the school district is effectively requiring your child interact with in school (or at home). I know, I fought for this data for YEARS. Letters, phone calls, federal complaints (FERPA), state complaints, etc.

Is EdTech a scam?!…where the district claims they protect your data but warns you no system can be 100% secure. They admit it—they CANNOT guarantee this data will be kept secure. This data is very attractive to hackers, and your children generate the data (money) that fuels this hundred-billion dollar plus industry.

Having data on paper is WAY more secure; how many people around the world are going to show up at the school’s front door attempting to steal the paper? Data held online in an application or storage database can be maliciously sought by anyone around the world. Not only is paper more secure, it will not lead to hundreds of millions of data points being collected on a single student.

If your state tells you that you have a right to see the data held in educational record then they need to prove it, because in Florida, I could not get the data.

Parental Rights—my %$$!

We refuse to agree to vendor policies and terms (contract) to access data schools should be freely sharing with parents, without requiring we contract with a third party to get it! They are holding a small portion of my kid’s data hostage (inside an app) unless I agree to these no-choice contracts. The bulk of the data held by those third parties, the district just won’t provide at all.

Parents: You are feeding the beast when you agree to third party contracts and install what I consider spyware on your phone.

There is no compelling state interest in this pervasive online data collection in school. It is unconstitutional.

Even if the software only collected metadata, which it innately does, I have the right to deny its use or pick and choose where I am willing to take a risk—I decide how much risk and exposure I want for my children and family online. Metadata is powerful information and based on school contracts I have read, it appears metadata is owned by the third party vendor who retains the right to use it as they see fit.

If they tell you metadata is de-identified, I would not be the first or the last to challenge the practical truth of that statement. Such claims are sophistry at work. Besides, I don’t care if it is anonymized, de-identified, or made into some ridiculously loopholed language or not, they would not have mountains of data from which to profit or surveil without USING our children (for profit). This is the business model of EdTech.

These technologies collect a boatload more than just metadata. EdTech can even retain intellectual property (IP) under the fair use doctrine. It seems though that fair use would mean you’ve published your original work or voluntarily given your IP to someone. Is it fair use when you are told you HAVE to give it away for mandatory schooling in an app without compensation?

This is no longer turn in your paper and the teacher gives it back. Your thoughts and ideas are gone. AI can train on your words and your ideas. You will never know if AI took your inventive idea for someone else. How will you know if a corporation used AI to siphon your ideas from your student paper for their own use?

Schools are becoming completely dependent on third parties to operate. These third parties get access to your child’s data, they can use it to train their AI, they can use it to surveil your children, and develop or improve new products in their portfolio (that they will use for profit). Your children’s data are the fuel for their profits. Our school district is far along in this tyrannical data collection scheme and the obliteration of parental rights.

How much of your child’s soul are you willing to let them to take?

Source: The Blue Dot, Issue No. 13,UNESCO MGIEP
MGIEP: Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development

Posted in Data Privacy, EdTech Tyranny, PII, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Public Schools: A Massive For-Profit Surveillance Operation

BREACHED: Hillsborough Schools (FL) Seventh Largest School District in USA

On August 31, the country’s seventh largest school district sent correspondence to not all parents about a cybersecurity incident. Very little data is trickling out about what happened. Thirteen days later Hillsborough Schools has still not revealed when the malicious actors breached school systems.

On September 4, I emailed Superintendent Ayres and the Chief Technology Officer seeking comment on twelve questions. I sent a follow up email on September 11 asking for the district to respond to the questions.

Then on September 12, Hillsborough County School District (HCSD) answered TWO of the twelve questions. Their response was essentially a summary of what had already been communicated to not all parents in an update on September 5.

As of September 14, there is NO notice on Hillsborough County Schools Website about this breach. Not all parents are receiving email communications regarding the event.

It now appears the school district is picking and choosing with whom to release information, distinguishing a parent separately from the PTA executive board. Yesterday I discovered that a Facebook Group titled “Hillsborough County Council PTA/PTSA Advocacy Group” reported on September 6, that the Hillsborough County PTA executive board met with Superintendent Ayres and he revealed it was a ransomware event and that HCSD did not pay the ransom—the third question on my list, left unanswered.

Why has this new information not been provided to all parents and staff publicly?

This matters to parents and teachers, because very sensitive data has been collected without informed consent. In 2019, I wrote Teachers, Parents, Countrymen: How Much of Your Personal Data Does the School District Share? to bring attention to just how much sensitive data could be collected.

Here are the two answers they did provide to my questions (pictured below):

(2) “On August 31, the district sent correspondence to staff and families that it was addressing an apparent cybersecurity incident involving a number of technology systems in the district.”

(8) “We continue to be in communication with the FBI, FDLE, and the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office regarding this incident.”

(11) “…worked to restore full function to our core operational systems…” This did not really answer my question, as it only references their core operational systems.

The district also wrote: “we have no indication that there was any unauthorized access to data stored in our student information system”.

Translation: there might have been unauthorized access, but we don’t know.

YOU, as the parent, have had YOUR power to protect your children from digital TYRANNY stripped from your soul. That God given natural right you have to protect your children as you see fit has been trampled by your government.

I will tell you how I know this.

Since 2016, I have battled with my heart and soul to protect my children from student data collection. My heart and soul were tested beyond belief by my school district as I spent endless hours, nights, weekends, and vacations researching and advocating to stop the data (and metadata) being stolen from my children and yours. They don’t care.

I have written US and state legislators, multiple FL Governors, FL Commissioners of Education, filed federal complaints, filed state complaints, reported a Hillsborough Schools classroom/student data breach in our school district to the Florida Department of Education Office of Inspector General (OIG) that resulted in a website being taken down, spoken public comment to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and much more. The results from my emails and letters: intra-government fingerpointing and “lack of jurisdiction.” Not one legislator reached out. I even traveled multiple times to Tallahassee to speak out against an “online protection” bill last session that does little to protect but does much to trample Parental Rights. The Parental Rights our Florida legislature claims to protect.

By 2016, our children were being tracked by a “learning management system” that was contracted as a gradebook but did way more than act as a “gradebook.” I wrote about my concerns with this system here and here and finally here—where I explained how my concerns from the first post were vindicated (because these same issues were investigated by another country!). We asked for our children to be removed or provided an alias in that system. We were told by the district that they did not think the vendor could do so at this time. This led to concerns the vendor was not properly qualified as a “school official” under FERPA. Why? Because under FERPA, for a vendor to qualify as a “school official” and thus collect or receive records, the school district must maintain direct control over the use and maintenance of educational records. As I understood the school district’s response, the vendor was in control; not the school district.

In 2018, I wrote to the Florida’s Department of Education to warn about the inadequacy and insecurity of Hillsborough School District’s password systems. Then in 2020, Boca News reported a “hack” in Palm Beach County School District, indicating the vulnerability was the very problem I reported to the state in 2018, nearly two years earlier.

My children were forced onto digital systems that collect behavioral data without my knowledge or consent, accounts were created in their identities with for-profit companies—collecting data. The district repeatedly denied us access to all of our children’s data, including what accounts were created by the school district with companies.

My first grader was sent to the principal’s office and threatened for standing up for his rights and for following our [parental] instructions: not to login to experimental learning platforms that collect his data. We were not called. Our child was forced to log into the system.

Unfortunately the State of Florida is contributing to this problem by instituting laws and policies that encourage this activity. Data Collection ramped up with the Statewide Longitudinal Data System pushed under Governor Jeb Bush (using federal grants) that created a need for student information systems. This activity and more continues through Florida’s actions today. For example, requiring cloud based solutions to be the first choice, and AI surveillance of students online—just two of many examples.

All data collected online is at risk.

Stand up for your parental rights and you will quickly learn you are actually living under tyranny—you just don’t know it yet. I encourage you to stand up because without every one of you, our rights will be continually eroded.

Just this week we were informed that our child’s best interests were to be held hostage again by another public school pay to play scheme. Let’s hope it will have a happy ending.

I will not be deterred from sharing what I know and believe about this industry.

Join me in standing up for your parental rights and protecting the innocence and privacy of our children.

Posted in Data Privacy, EdTech Tyranny, Hillsborough Schools, PII, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on BREACHED: Hillsborough Schools (FL) Seventh Largest School District in USA

Scholastic Bucks, Books, and Their Left-Overs

In 2018 I discovered the series Dork Diaries and the deleterious effects it has on children. Imagine your school book fair selling a book to your joyful seven year old; a book you have no idea is filled with a litany of atrocious behavior. Then listening, horrified, as your child naively emulates phrases from books with the following content:

“Just two minutes ago, she was Miss Thang with a funky attitude, talking trash and all up in my face like NOSE HAIR.” 1

“I wouldn’t WANT your PATHETIC life…” 2

“She’s so UGLY she might BREAK your camera!” 2

The trust I placed in school libraries and Scholastic was broken. I began my research on Scholastic Book Fairs.

With the recent public interest in Scholastic, I dug up my 2018 research to share this glaring problem: Scholastic designed a book fair program that negatively influences the curation of school library holdings every year, dumbing down school libraries. Their incentive programs result in packing libraries with books sourced from Scholastic’s curated catalogs, while time-tested classics are culled (tossed out); I discussed the ALA’s book banning of children’s classics in 2022. Together these organizations have transformed the character of our public school libraries into something most Americans do not want for their children.

Schools hold book fairs to fundraise for new library books. These fundraisers become necessary because public school districts often budget little to nothing for school library books. Yet, true to a for-profit operating in schools, Scholastic incents schools to convert book fair cash proceeds into Scholastic Dollars—fattening Scholastic’s bottom line:

“It’s a no-brainer. For choosing Scholastic Dollars, we reward you with up to 50% extra value for your Fair earnings.” 4

School earnings are available in cash, but according to Scholastic’s 2018 FAQ Page:

“…the best value, and the way to provide the highest number of great books and educational resources to your school, is to redeem your earnings in Scholastic Dollars…” 3

I disagree with that dubious claim that hinges on their definition of “great books”.

Schools are then locked into using their Scholastic dollars in Scholastic’s catalog—books and supplies the company pre-selects (i.e. limits) for your library or school:

“Redeem them [Scholastic Dollars] in the Scholastic Dollars Catalog” 4

In the world of books, that is likely a limited selection optimized to maximize Scholastic interests. In fact, given the books I found in their catalog, choosing this path would surely degrade the quality of holdings in our own at-home library.

Scholastic doesn’t stop there:

“After your Fair, redeem your Scholastic Dollars on your remaining stock.” 4

Of course they want schools to spend their proceeds on left-over book fair stock. Such a strategy could help Scholastic move slow inventory and fill libraries with book fair left-overs.

In January this year, they were still promoting the purchase of book fair left-overs with Scholastic Dollars by noting the obvious: “No shipping costs or wait time!” They want school libraries to buy up book fair rejects.

Consistent with their 2018 catalog, the second half of the 2022-2023 Scholastic Book Fair Catalog includes classroom supplies, furniture, carpets, gifts, and other non-book items. Many classics such as D’Aulaires Book of Greek Myths are missing, but Charlotte’s Web is still there, so there’s that!

I challenge parents to count the children’s classics in the Scholastic Dollars Catalog!

Scholastic Dollars Book Fair Catalog offers a Greek Mythology set of eight for $262.32. Pictured here:

D’Aulaires Book of Greek Myths is a children’s classic that includes 208 pages about many more than eight gods, goddesses, heroes and monsters, along with beautiful illustrations in hardcover for about $25-$27 depending on the vendor. My copy is pictured below.


Do school librarians fall prey to slick marketing, allowing Scholastic to decide which books to offer our children?!

Who decides what products Scholastic offers to sell at the school book fairs? Do they preference their highest margin products? I wonder if that is why we saw so many decorative erasers, dysfunctional pens, and bookmarks coming home from book fairs. Scholastic was called out in 2009 for misusing their book clubs to sell “toys, games, makeup and other items under the guise of a literary book club that is promoted in classrooms.”

In Scholastic’s 2016/2017 annual report:

“…Scholastic delivered significant growth…driven by new Harry Potter publishing and strong sales of Dav Pilkey’s Dog Man and Captain Underpants series.”

Captain Underpants is a series that churns out potty talk. To excuse this kind of literature we are often told something like it is great material to engage reluctant readers—but even gifted voracious readers are fed these products that do a disservice to all children.

As a result of my research I prohibited my children from attending Scholastic Book Fairs. Although, one time I did relent when our children succumbed to the marketing enticements of Scholastic Book Fairs. Yet, the caveat was they were to be escorted by me, they could not buy overpriced Chinese tchotchkies, and their book choices had to be approved by me. During our trip we found VERY few books that were acceptable, but they each did find a book: one on reptiles and one about Virginia Hall.

Scholastic’s website now encourages the use of eWallets for children. Parents put money on an eWallet, then after the book sale eWallet funds convert to a gift card. Do eWallets enable Scholastic to track your child’s book choices? Clearly, your unspent funds are locked into Scholastic gift cards. They’ve thought of everything for promoting eWallet use, even ready-made promos for email and social media including downloadable Letters to Teachers, Flyers for Families, social media posts, etc.

They even offer bonus incentives to earn extra scholastic dollars to “Promote eWallet friends and family sharing”

If schools push eWallets or spend Scholastic Dollars to stock classroom libraries, the school can earn extra scholastic dollars!

Your kids are a captive audience and the government allows product placement in school libraries by a for-profit company exhibiting what feels like predatory marketing.

The solution is simple: end Scholastic book fairs and demand your school districts create a reasonable budget for school libraries to purchase quality literature in the open market.



1 Russell, Rachel Renée. Dork Diaries: Tales from a Not-So-Perfect Pet Sitter. Aladdin, July 2016, p. 29

2 Russell, Rachel Renée. Dork Diaries: Tales from a Not-So-Friendly Frenemy. Aladdin, Nov 2016, pp.146, 229.

3 2018, (source now redirects elsewhere):
https://web.archive.org/web/20180806090559/http://direct.www.scholastic.com/bookfairs/scholasticdollars/faq.asp

4 2022, (source also redirects after landing) https://web.archive.org/web/20220824131231/https://bookfairs.scholastic.com/content/fairs/chairperson/case-profit.html

Posted in Kids Books, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Scholastic Bucks, Books, and Their Left-Overs

Part II. The Quiet Culling of Children’s Classics: Are Public School Librarians the Real “Book Banners”?

Asking questions, listening to my kids, and trusting my instincts: this was how I discovered what was going on in libraries.

In 2017 my children were coming home with very poor quality literature. They could read one of these “books” in 20 minutes. Our books at home took hours for them to read; something didn’t seem right with these library books. The book covers looked cartoonish and commercialized. I flipped through them and discovered many modeled detrimental behavior such as how-tos on bullying, crude humor, disrespect toward adults and the elderly, and socially unacceptable behavior and language.

I asked my children to select more enriching books and guided them on what to seek. They came home empty handed, time and time again. They reiterated only a few books were available, but they’d already read them. So in 2017 I researched library holdings from several of our district’s elementary school libraries; it was VERY concerning.

Recently, I performed a more extensive search of library holdings at one library from the 2017 analysis. The search was expanded to 102 classics and well-regarded children’s authors. Many of these authors are on Mensa reading lists, NIH reading lists, and an author list published by Dr. Sandra Stotsky.

The selected elementary school is an A rated elementary school in Hillsborough County Public Schools, FL with over 800 students in 2022-23. What I found, or rather didn’t find, in this library is alarming.

Children’s classics seem to have been disappeared from this school library serving over 800 students. Today, there are six fewer book titles in this library from the list of 35 authors selected in 2017.

From the expanded selection of 102 authors, there were only 151 books in the library. 53% of these authors had ZERO books in this library. 91% of these authors had three or fewer books in this library. (See pie chart below.) Keep in mind some of these 102 authors wrote dozens of children’s books and many wrote more than a few.

The 102 authors are represented by an average of only 1.48 books per author. If the top 5 authors (contemporary authors) were removed, this average falls to 0.87 books per author.

On the other hand, there are 194 books in this school library from just five popular, contemporary authors that include titles like Captain Underpants, Dog Man, and Dork Diaries. (See bar graph below). The Captain Underpants series is frequently found on “banned book” lists, yet there are plenty of these books in this library. These five authors average 39 books per author and represent 1.96% of the library holdings (9,896 books). Five authors represent a larger percentage of this library’s holdings than 102 highly-respected authors.

Who is really disappearing books, our history, and our common cultural heritage? This is The Quiet Culling of Children’s Classics.

Posted in Hillsborough Schools, Kids Books, Public Schools, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Part II. The Quiet Culling of Children’s Classics: Are Public School Librarians the Real “Book Banners”?